Compassionate Release Statistics

In 1984, Congress passed legislation authorizing federal courts to reduce a federal prisoner's judgement when "extraordinary and compelling" circumstances be to justify early release. The police force directed the U.S. Sentencing Committee to develop policy as to such circumstances. Unfortunately, the law also limited who tin can bring a motility for compassionate release. In brusk, only ane person tin can bring such a motion: the Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. This commodity discusses compassionate release statistics in an effort to help those affected understand the reality of the federal empathetic release program.

Given the fact that the Bureau of Prisons is an agency that exists solely to keep prisoners bars within its institutions, it is not surprising to learn that the Bureau is extraordinarily stingy when information technology comes to filing motions requesting the compassionate release of a prisoner. What's more, when it comes to compassionate release, the Agency seems to exist indifferent to negative PR and even harsh words from Senators and the Section of Justice's Office of the Inspector General (OIG).

 The 2013 Part of Inspector Full general Report

In 2013, the OIG issued a report based on a review of the BOP'southward handling of compassionate release requests from 2006 through 2011. The OIG wasCompassionate Release Statistics candid in its findings: "The BOP does not properly manage the empathetic release program, resulting in inmates who may be candidates for release not being considered." The numbers tell the story:

  • Simply the 208 requests that were referred to the Director by Wardens were reviewed by the OIG because the Agency had no way of knowing how many total applications were received by the Wardens.
  • 206 of the 208 requests referred to the Manager were for medical reasons, either a terminal or debilitating illness.
  • The Director canonical 142 (68 percent) and denied 38 (18 percent).
  • Of the 38 that were denied, 22 (58 percent) were denied due to the seriousness of the prisoner's crime or criminal history.
  • 28 (13 per centum) of the 206 medical applicants died while waiting for a response from the Director.

The BOP'due south Response to the August 2017 Letter from 12 Senators

On Baronial 3, 2017, twelve U.S. Senators wrote a letter of the alphabet to (former) BOP Managing director Thomas Kane in which they expressed business concern over the Bureau's administration of the compassionate release program. The Senators requested information from the BOP equally to its handling of the programme. In response to the request, the BOP supplied the following data for the years 2014 to 2018:

  • Wardens received 817 applications based on a concluding medical condition; 405 were referred to the Director (<50 pct).
  • Wardens received 1,106 applications based on a debilitating medical condition; 181 were referred to the Managing director (<20 percent).
  • Wardens received 477 applications for elderly-medical compassionate release; 117 were referred to the Director (<25 per centum).
  • Wardens received 268 applications for elderly-not-medical compassionate release; 87 were referred to the Director (<40 percent).
  • Wardens received 282 applications for child caregiver compassionate release; 33 were referred to the Director (<fifteen percent)
  • Wardens received 109 applications for incapacitated spouse compassionate release; 15 were referred to the Director (<15 percent).
  • Although the numbers do not add together up, the BOP told the Senators that from 2014 to 2018, the Manager approved 306 requests for compassionate release consideration and denied 2,405.
  • 81 prisoners died between 2014 and 2018 while awaiting a compassionate release determination from the Managing director.

These empathetic release statistics show how rarely the Bureau of Prisons grants relief.

The 2018 New York Times Report

Federal data obtained by The Marshall Projection and The New York Times was examined for a March 7, 2018 report actualization in the Times. According to the data, which covered 2013 to 2017:

  • v,400 compassionate release applications were received by Wardens.
  • Approximately 300 applications, or six percent, were approved by the Director.
  • 50 applications (2 percent) for non-medical release were canonical by the Director.
  • The Bureau did not explicate why the data provided to the Times did non match which was given to the twelve Senators.

What Do These Empathetic Release Statistics Mean?

The long and curt of every slice of data that has been made bachelor is that the BOP is not doing its chore when it comes to compassionate release. The Bureau appears to be operating nether the misapprehension that information technology is within its rights to make up one's mind whether a prisoner's circumstances warrant a judgement reduction. As the Senators pointed out, this is not the example. " It is the appropriate purview of the sentencing court to make up one's mind if a defendant'south circumstances warrant a sentencing reduction nether compassionate release," wrote the Senators.

Pursuant to federal law, the Agency's actual position is an authoritative one. If the criteria established by the U.S. Sentencing Commission are met, the Bureau has the simple administrative task of filing the movement in federal courtroom. Regardless of this, the Agency seems more interested in locking upwards their inmates than assuasive sentencing courts to consider the vast majority of empathetic release cases.

If you have other questions about compassionate release statistics, please don't hesitate to contact us at 802-444-4357.

Related Content

  • Empathetic Release in Federal Prison
  • Compassionate Release Information: Elderly and Medical Costs
  • Compassionate Release Statistics FAQs
  • Criteria for Compassionate Release
  • Empathetic Release FAQs